We do not guarantee result, one way or the other, in litigation. In fact no one can. Why ..... keep reading. The out come of litigation depends upon a lot many factors like facts, legal position, manner of presenting the case, the efficiency and skill of the advocates, the care taken by the clients in … Continue reading We do not guarantee result in litigation – why…
Blog
When can you initiate IBC action, if the Arbitration award is in your favour?
initiate IBC action, if the Arbitration award
Whether SFIO needs to complete the investigation within the time specified by the Central Govt.?
The Apex Court held that the period that the Central Govt. may prescribe to complete investigation u/s.212(3) is directory and no fixed period is provided for completion of investigation by SFIO; transfer of investigation by other agencies to SFIO u/s.212(2) of the Companies Act 2013 is irrevocable; when accused is directed to remand by a … Continue reading Whether SFIO needs to complete the investigation within the time specified by the Central Govt.?
Asset held in trust not subject to the moratorium u/s.14 of the IBC
Asset held in trust not subject to the moratorium u/s.14 of the IBC. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. filed application before NCLT, Chandigarh bench seeking its direction to allow it to lift its stock of raw materials of approx. Rs.14 crore in possession of the Parabolic Drugs Ltd (Corporate Debtor). The Corporate Debtor was undergoing the … Continue reading Asset held in trust not subject to the moratorium u/s.14 of the IBC
An arbitration clause that is contained in a contract would not “exist” as a matter of law until the contract is duly stamped
The Hon’ble Supreme Court on 10 April 2019 in Garware Wall Ropes Ltd vs Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 6361/2019) ruled that when the Supreme Court or the High Court when considers an application under Section 11(4) to 11(6) under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act or Arbitration Act) and comes … Continue reading An arbitration clause that is contained in a contract would not “exist” as a matter of law until the contract is duly stamped
Supreme Court holds that the RBI Circular of 12 Feb 2018 not valid
Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd v Union of India and Others, on 02 April 2019 held the constitutional validity of Ss. 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949 (the Banking Regulation Act) and also held that the RBI circular of 12.02.2018 directing banking and non-banking companies to initiate action … Continue reading Supreme Court holds that the RBI Circular of 12 Feb 2018 not valid
Sec.138 of NI Act is not hit by Section 14 of I&B Code
This post is about the judgement of Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NLCAT) in Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd v. P. Mohanraj & Ors. (Order dt.31.7.2018). The order is under challenge before Hon’ble Supreme Court. It may be recalled that upon the admission of matter for corporate insolvency resolution process (u/Ss. 7 or 9 … Continue reading Sec.138 of NI Act is not hit by Section 14 of I&B Code
THE BANNING OF UNREGULATED DEPOSIT SCHEMES ORDINANCE, 2019
Commencement, scope and overriding effect: The Ordinance called the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Ordinance, 2019 notified on 21st February 2019 came into force on the same date. It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The Ordinance is in addition to provisions of other law Sec.35[/efn_not]. The Ordinance … Continue reading THE BANNING OF UNREGULATED DEPOSIT SCHEMES ORDINANCE, 2019
The constitutional validity of the IBC upheld by the Apex Court
Sharing a summary of a landmark Judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court (dated 25.1.2019) in Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. The Constitutional validity of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the Code or the IBC) was challenged by 10 writ petitions and an SLP. All these are disposed of … Continue reading The constitutional validity of the IBC upheld by the Apex Court
NCLAT triggers insolvency against an unincorporated Joint Venture IBC
On 30 Nov 2018, the NCLAT has held that insolvency can be triggered against an unincorporated joint venture between two companies. Effectively, insolvency will be triggered against both companies. It is a landmark judgement in several aspects. The most important aspect is that it gives relief to property buyers, where under the grab of tri-patry … Continue reading NCLAT triggers insolvency against an unincorporated Joint Venture IBC